<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>3FORWARD &#187; Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://3forward.com/sales-leaders-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://3forward.com</link>
	<description>B2B Sales Process Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:08:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Time to Evolve Your Inside Sales Team</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/its-time-to-evolve-your-inside-sales-team/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/its-time-to-evolve-your-inside-sales-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have several clients in the process of abandoning their outdated inside “bang the phones” cold calling lead generation teams in favor of new, best-practices-based lead management models.  They realize that they must change their lead creation process to have &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Marketing-Evolution.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-5870" title="Marketing Evolution" src="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Marketing-Evolution.jpg" alt="" width="214" height="160" /></a>We have several clients in the process of abandoning their outdated inside <em>“bang the phones”</em> cold calling lead generation teams in favor of new, best-practices-based lead management models.  They realize that they must change their lead creation process to have any hope of providing the quantity and quality of leads their outside sales reps need to keep the pipeline full.</p>
<p>The challenge these companies face is converting those “cold callers” into the new breed of inside sales rep capable of taking a marketing qualified lead, engaging that prospect in a meaningful conversation and further vetting the opportunity.</p>
<p>At a minimum this transformation process will require an investment in time, training and ongoing coaching and in the end it’s likely you will need to replace some or all of the existing team.  Before you get started we recommend you take a close look at your current approach to find the flaws.</p>
<p><strong>Are You Rewarding Inside Sales for the Wrong Behavior?</strong></p>
<p>Depending on how you originally built your compensation methodology for your inside team you could actually be <strong>reducing</strong> the effectiveness of your outside team.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Example:</span> many companies gauge the number of appointments set by an inside sales person as a measure of their productivity and they often compensate on this single metric.  This approach has two potential negative impacts.</p>
<ol>
<li>The first impact is that your outside team is chasing unqualified leads which greatly reduces their effectiveness.</li>
<li>The second impact is that your outside sales team will lose confidence in the inside team and may not follow-up on leads in a timely basis. This is a worst-case scenario because you are paying out commission dollars and your firm is receiving little to no benefit from it at all.</li>
</ol>
<p>Since the goal of your internal lead team is to qualify those leads that have the highest likelihood to close, your inside team should focus first on quality and then on quantity.  Rewarding your inside team to do this can sometimes be a challenge.</p>
<p><strong>Two Early Steps to Transforming Inside Sales and Demand Generation</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">First, challenge the inside team to fully validate a lead’s qualification through an internally developed model.  Then only allow them to pass leads to the outside team when they reach the right score.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Second, the outside team has the responsibility to act on those leads quickly, as time helps no sale.</p>
<p>Since the goal of lead generation is to bring in new prospects, make sure you have the right processes in place to accomplish it.   If you have questions or comments we would love to hear from you.  You may also be interested in looking at <a href="http://3forward.com/sales-consulting/lead-management-consulting/">3FORWARD’s Lead Ready</a> offering to get an idea of best-practices to consider in today’s demand generation model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/its-time-to-evolve-your-inside-sales-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sales and Marketing Alignment, All Talk and No Action</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/sales-and-marketing-alignment-all-talk-and-no-action/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/sales-and-marketing-alignment-all-talk-and-no-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last two years I have read over 200 articles / blog posts on the criticality of sales and marketing alignment. Yes, there is a lot of talk about aligning sales and marketing but according to Marketing Sherpa’s 2012 &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Sales-and-Marketing.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5865" title="Sales and Marketing" src="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Sales-and-Marketing.jpg" alt="" width="243" height="161" /></a>In the last two years I have read over 200 articles / blog posts on the criticality of sales and marketing alignment. Yes, there is a lot of talk about aligning sales and marketing but according to <strong>Marketing Sherpa’s 2012 B2B Benchmark Report</strong> almost 50% of the 1,745 survey respondents reported that it is still a significant challenge. This lack of alignment not only impairs a firm’s ability to succeed, it also cause a tremendous amount of friction and animosity between the sales and marketing teams.</p>
<p>You will often hear sales complain about the quality and quantity of marketing leads and conversely the marketing teams will typically respond with “you need to sell more effectively.”  If this process is so important why is it so difficult for most firms to figure it out?</p>
<p>The report identifies one of the primary drivers of sales and marketing misalignment stems from varying goals between organizations. The primary sales goals are almost always new business bookings, growth in existing accounts, and renewals.  If marketing’s objectives don’t correlate with at least a couple of these goals you already have a big problem!</p>
<p>According to the <strong>Marketing Sherpa B2B Benchmark Report,</strong> here are 3 of the top key performance indicators that <em>B2B marketers</em> believe needed to be improved for sales results to improve.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<table width="222" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="221"><strong>Lead Volume</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="54"><strong>68%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="221"><strong>Lead Quality</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="54"><strong>61%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="221"><strong>Insight Into Lead Data</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="54"><strong>58%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>To answer the call for more and higher quality leads both sales and marketing leadership need to establish an ongoing dialog to establish common goals and objectives.</p>
<p><strong>Three Steps to Better Sales and Marketing Coordination</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>The team must measure performance with metrics agreed to by both organizations.</li>
<li>These meeting should be a regularly scheduled event and be frequent enough to move these priorities forward.</li>
<li>Last and probably most important is that sales and marketing alignment must be a priority of the C-Suite. When the C-Suite is engaged things tend to happen faster, use them to your advantage.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/sales-and-marketing-alignment-all-talk-and-no-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improving B2B Sales Close Rates Is All About Timing</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/improving-b2b-sales-close-rates-is-all-about-timing/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/improving-b2b-sales-close-rates-is-all-about-timing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many sales cold calls have you made this week, ten, twenty, more? How many qualified prospects have you discovered during your prospecting activities? If you are like most sales reps the answer is probably very few!  Selling &#8211; just &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/lead-funnel1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5857" title="lead funnel" src="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/lead-funnel1.jpg" alt="" width="135" height="177" /></a>How many sales cold calls have you made this week, ten, twenty, more? How many qualified prospects have you discovered during your prospecting activities? If you are like most sales reps the answer is probably very few!  Selling &#8211; just like life &#8211; is all about timing.</p>
<p>Being at the right place at right time is everything; the question is how can you better predict how to be at the right place at the right time? The answer lies in being able to know when a prospect goes from a status quo environment to some degree of dissatisfaction with their current situation.</p>
<p>According to the Craig Elias and Tibor Shanto, the authors of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Shift, Turning Prospects Into Customers</span>, understanding when a prospect has a triggering event that moves them from status quo into the <em>“window of dissatisfaction”</em> can greatly increase your chances of closing a sale. The key is to engage with the prospect as soon as they enter this phase and before your competition does.   Here are some statistics they reference in their book that reinforce their point.</p>
<p><strong>Closing percentages based on prospect buying mode</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="203"><strong>Prospect Status</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="194"><strong>Average Closing Percentage</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="203">Status Quo</td>
<td valign="top" width="194">
<p align="center">&lt;1%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="203">Window of Dissatisfaction</td>
<td valign="top" width="194">
<p align="center">60-90%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="203">Actively Seeking Solutions</td>
<td valign="top" width="194">
<p align="center">10-20%</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The close ratio of decision makers in the <em>Window of Dissatisfaction</em> is high because they see the immediate value of becoming one of your customers.  These types of prospects make decision more quickly because they need their pain removed immediately, and they are less likely to shop around because the can see an immediate solution.</p>
<p>When a prospect is forced to actively seek solutions to their problems they will research possible options &#8211; and as you can see from the above closing percentages &#8211; your likelihood to close is vastly diminished.</p>
<p><strong>The real question for sales is: how do you know when a triggering event occurs and a prospect enters the highly valued Window of Dissatisfaction?  </strong>The answer is to stay in reasonable contact with your prospects at all times by feeding them a steady stream of value-added content <strong><em>and</em></strong> tracking when they visit your website and what they are looking at.</p>
<p>This can be accomplished by <a href="http://3forward.com/sales-consulting/lead-management-consulting/">implementing a lead management solution built on a marketing automation system</a>.  These applications allow you to consistently message your target audience and track their on-line behaviors to understand when they <strong>shift from a status quo mode</strong>.  Remember, the best practice approach is to provide your targets information that helps them solve problems or informs them of key market trends.  A continuous onslaught of sales message won’t be well received and may cause a high probability target to ignore you completely.</p>
<p>Take the time to investigate how to know when a target becomes dissatisfied, it will allow you to close more sales and improve your bottom line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/improving-b2b-sales-close-rates-is-all-about-timing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should B2B Companies Blog? YES They Should!</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/sales-2-0/should-b2b-companies-blog-yes-they-should/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/sales-2-0/should-b2b-companies-blog-yes-they-should/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 11:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s hard to believe that this year marks the 15th anniversary of web logs or blogs as we refer to them today. What started as a personal publication platform has exploded into it’s own market and has created a huge &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/blogging-image.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-5852" title="blogging image" src="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/blogging-image.jpg" alt="" width="246" height="160" /></a>It’s hard to believe that this year marks the 15<sup>th</sup> anniversary of web logs or blogs as we refer to them today. What started as a personal publication platform has exploded into it’s own market and has created a huge array of ancillary products and services.</p>
<p>For many companies their blog is the hub of their social media efforts with other social media spokes attached to it.  Blogging is hard work; it’s a big investment in terms of time and effort to ensure that you are building quality content that’s of interest and brings value to your target audience.  <strong>Aberdeen Group</strong> recently released a research brief entitled <em>“Bloggers Paradise-Best Practices For Business Blogging”</em> that shows how best-in-class companies are out-blogging and out-performing their industry average and laggard competitors. Here are just a few of their key findings.</p>
<p><strong>Best in Class Blog More Often</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Best in Class                     85% blog</li>
<li>Industry Average            73% blog</li>
<li>Laggard                            57% blog</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Best in Class Blog Better</strong> Study Weighted Average Unique Blog Visitors Per Month</p>
<ul>
<li>Best in Class                     2485 visitors per month</li>
<li>Industry Average            1713 visitors per month</li>
<li>Laggard                            1100 visitors per month</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Best in Class Out Perform the Competition</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Average annual revenue growth of 20% compared to -3% for laggards</li>
<li>10% YOY increase in marketing produced leads that result in closed business compared to a 1% decline for laggards</li>
<li>44% of sales forecasted pipeline generated by marketing versus 5% for laggard firms</li>
<li>73% customer retention rate compared to 7% for laggard companies</li>
</ul>
<p>Getting a blogging engine fired up will require discipline and focus.  For many companies, finding subject matter experts capable of producing quality content is there biggest challenge but not an insurmountable one.</p>
<p><strong>Basics of B2B Blogging</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Start by building a basic messaging calendar, it does not have to complex but you do need to decide who will be blogging and what the topics are, random blogging on uninteresting topics just wont work.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Consider asking guest bloggers to write for you, alternate viewpoints from partners and clients can really spice up a blog. In fact, 56% of Best in Class companies regularly feature external guest bloggers.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Posting a variety content in a variety of formats such as video, ebooks, whitepapers, and on demand webcasts are an excellent ways of building a loyal following, the key is to stay creative and provide meaningful content.</p>
<p>Blogging is a great way to engage with both customers and prospects. Maintain a good balance of company news, industry related information, and product/services news and your audience should grow nicely over time. If you have any blogging key tips or tricks we would love to hear from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/sales-2-0/should-b2b-companies-blog-yes-they-should/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Wrong With Most Outsourcing Company Websites</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/brand-image-building/what-is-wrong-with-most-outsourcing-company-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/brand-image-building/what-is-wrong-with-most-outsourcing-company-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand & Image Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I’m dreaming of a great provider website&#8221; That&#8217;s the intro to a must-read blog post from Horses for Sources outsourcing analyst Deb Kops.   &#8220;Why are outsourcing providers’ websites such an abysmal lot when, for many, they are buyers’ first introduction &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>&#8220;I’m dreaming of a great provider website&#8221;</h2>
<p>That&#8217;s the intro to a must-read blog post from Horses for Sources outsourcing analyst Deb Kops.   &#8220;Why are outsourcing providers’ websites such an abysmal lot when, for many, they are buyers’ first introduction to a provider?&#8221; Deb asks this simple question, then goes on to share her list of &#8220;website sins against mankind that our industry regularly commits.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whether your role is Sales, Marketing or CEO you need to check your site against Deb&#8217;s list and prepare yourself for a rude awakening!</p>
<h3><a title="Link to Horses for Sources" href="http://www.horsesforsources.com/dreaming-website_042412" target="_blank">Read the full post here!</a></h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/brand-image-building/what-is-wrong-with-most-outsourcing-company-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Marketing &#8211; A Case Study</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/technology-for-sales-marketing/facebook-marketing-a-case-study/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/technology-for-sales-marketing/facebook-marketing-a-case-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology For Sales & Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gents Place Puts A Modern Twist On Barbering This article appears under the title “Hair Extensions” in the May 7, 2012 edition of Forbes. Full Article on Forbes by Alex Knapp, you can follow him at: @TheAlexKnapp Since opening &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>The Gents Place Puts A Modern Twist On Barbering</h1>
<p><strong><em>This article appears under the title “Hair Extensions” in the May 7, 2012 edition of Forbes.</em></strong></p>
<h2><a title="Link to Forbes Article" href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2012/04/20/the-gents-place-puts-a-modern-twist-on-barbering/" target="_blank">Full Article on Forbes</a></h2>
<p>by Alex Knapp, you can follow him at: @TheAlexKnapp</p>
<p>Since opening the first Gents Place in Frisco, Tex. in December 2008, Davis has signed up more than 5,000 clients by offering a free haircut through Facebook.   <a title="Link to Forbes Article" href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2012/04/20/the-gents-place-puts-a-modern-twist-on-barbering/" target="_blank">Read More&#8230;.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/technology-for-sales-marketing/facebook-marketing-a-case-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the NFL Draft and Sales Team Recruiting Have In Common</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/managing-sales-teams/what-the-nfl-draft-and-sales-team-recruiting-have-in-common/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/managing-sales-teams/what-the-nfl-draft-and-sales-team-recruiting-have-in-common/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Managing Sales Teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NFL Draft happened last week and as expected two quarterbacks went as the number one and two pick in round one.  The draft began in 1936 and the original rationale in creating the draft was to increase the competitive &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/NFL-logo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5840" title="NFL logo" src="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/NFL-logo.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="170" /></a>The NFL Draft happened last week and as expected two quarterbacks went as the number one and two pick in round one.  The draft began in 1936 and the original rationale in creating the draft was to increase the competitive parity between the teams as the worst team would be able to choose the best player available. The basic design of the draft is that each team is given a drafting position in reverse order of its record in the previous year, i.e. the last place team drafts first, and so forth.</p>
<p>While it’s true that some teams sell or trade draft picks in order to position themselves for the best talent, the reality is when it’s time to pick they nearly always go for the best talent available regardless of their specific positional needs.  As an example, say a team is in need desperate need of a quarterback but there are no star quarterbacks available when their time comes up.  If the ‘best player available’ is a star defensive back, they will take that DB.</p>
<p><strong><em>History has shown winning teams will always take the defensive back because he is the best talent available.</em></strong> <strong></strong></p>
<p>Consider taking the NFL approach as you fill your next open sales position. I know you can’t always trade up to a better pick but you can focus on hiring the best talent available to you at any point in time.  If you are searching for a channel sales manger but discover an inside sales rock star &#8211; find a way to make a position on your team for the rock star.  Bringing in new top talent causes your other “A” players to step up their game and really puts the pressure on your “B” players to improve or risk being permanently replaced.  Jack Welch often suggested you should remove your bottom 20% performers every year and this type of ‘best available’ hiring ensures you are constantly upgrading your team.</p>
<p>Just like a football team a sales team requires a wide variety of skills and talents to win consistently.  Make sure that you are continually on the hunt for the right talent and you have a policy of hiring the best talent available.  Don’t wait until you have an open position to fill because tomorrow is the start of the new season!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/managing-sales-teams/what-the-nfl-draft-and-sales-team-recruiting-have-in-common/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confrontation is Critical For Sales Success</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/confrontation-is-critical-for-sales-success/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/confrontation-is-critical-for-sales-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confrontation is defined as a discord or a clash of opinions and ideas, and it’s not surprising that most people avoid confrontations at all costs. But when it comes to making decisions about conflicted business and sales processes confrontation is &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Sales-Confrontation.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5830" title="Sales Confrontation" src="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Sales-Confrontation.jpg" alt="" width="207" height="195" /></a>Confrontation is defined as a discord or a clash of opinions and ideas, and it’s not surprising that most people avoid confrontations at all costs. But when it comes to making decisions about conflicted business and sales processes confrontation is necessary to keep your sales process dynamic. This is especially true regarding the interaction between sales and marketing teams.</p>
<p>For many years, <strong>sales and marketing organizations</strong> have had very specific roles and responsibilities, which often were out of alignment with the each other. Marketing has traditionally focused on branding, messaging, collateral, and program level lead generation.  Meanwhile, the sales team has focused almost exclusively on cold calling, working their Rolodex and managing opportunities.</p>
<p>If the ultimate goal is to increase company revenue why do many sales organizations resist accepting marketing generated leads?  The answer is that in many situations there is no definition of what a qualified lead looks like.</p>
<p>If you are a CEO, and your feel that your sales and marketing teams are misaligned, you must confront them both (nicely) and foster a collaboration effort now.  Citing some of the proof points from a recent <strong>Aberdeen Group</strong> report entitled <em>“Sales and Marketing Alignment &#8211; The New Power Couple”</em> is a good way to get the conversation started.  Here are just a few observations from the report.<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Forecasted sales generated by marketing</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Best in class companies                    <strong>40%</strong></li>
<li>Industry average companies           <strong>22%</strong></li>
<li>Laggard companies                           <strong>13%</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Year over year annual revenue growth</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Best in class companies                    <strong>+ 31.6%</strong></li>
<li>Industry average companies           <strong>+ 18.2%</strong></li>
<li>Laggard companies                           <strong>– 6.7%</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Organizations are constantly striving to increase revenues in a challenging business climate with its associated resource constraints.  As it’s unlikely that this environment will change near term &#8211; sales and marketing must work more closely together to achieve growth at the lowest possible cost.  If your firm is under-performing on the lead generation front take the time to <strong>confront the problem</strong> head on and start improving both the quality and quantity of leads for your sales team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/lead-lifecycle-management/confrontation-is-critical-for-sales-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shared (Sales) Responsibility is No Responsibility!</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/sales-leaders-blog/shared-sales-responsibility-is-no-sales-responsibility/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/sales-leaders-blog/shared-sales-responsibility-is-no-sales-responsibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s that time of year again!  No, I am not talking about the opening of the Major League Baseball season, I am talking about your first board meeting of 2012. If you made your Q1 revenue plan and if the &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Shared-Responsibility.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5824" title="Shared Responsibility" src="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Shared-Responsibility.jpg" alt="" width="252" height="201" /></a>It’s that time of year again!  No, I am not talking about the opening of the Major League Baseball season, I am talking about your first board meeting of 2012. If you made your Q1 revenue plan and if the pipeline is strong it should be a low stress meeting.</p>
<p><strong>The selling environment however remains difficult and the odds are that you either had to stretch to make the Q1 Sales Plan or you missed it by a mile. </strong></p>
<p>If your miss was significant it’s a natural instinct to try and “share” the responsibility with others. Perhaps the sales portfolio was weak, or you had operational/delivery, issues, or your sales team was not fully staffed. Regardless of the reasons if you are the CEO or the Chief Sales Officer the responsibility is yours alone!  Your board is not interested in excuses – they are interested in the actions and activities you plan to implement to fix the issue.  Whether you made it by just a hair or missed badly, here is a good 3-step approach to articulating the problem and explaining your roadmap for sales improvement.</p>
<h3 style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>First, Solve the Sales Equation</strong></h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">How much revenue or bookings are needed between now and the end of the plan year to make the number? Compare this with your current qualified pipeline to determine you unidentified pipeline gap. If you have metrics on your sales cycle time, sales stage velocity, and closing rate you can quickly determine the true unidentified gap in terms of additional new deals to get back on track.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">You may determine that you need additional headcount or that you must increase deal size or volumes to cover the gap.  Investment may be needed to catch up and now is the right time to ask the board for some additional support, but make sure your “get-well” plan is grounded in metrics you can back up.  It makes better sense to invest to make the bottom line instead of cutting expenses somewhere downstream and seasoned board members will recognize this.</p>
<h3 style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Second, Solve the Lead Generation Equation</strong></h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">If you don’t have a lead generation process, or if the one you have is not yielding the results needed, you have to investigate this immediately.  It’s common for sales people to complain that the leads provided by marketing are weak.  This often means reps create 100% of their own leads via cold calling.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Sales reps are expensive resources and to be effective they need a steady stream of highly qualified prospects. Take the time to work with your marketing team to jointly define what a good lead looks like and make sure your sale people follow-up on each of them and provide feedback on those leads that are deemed unqualified.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">If you don’t have a lead generation program it’s time to establish one. Consider using one of the many marketing automation tools that help you engage and track the behaviors of your prospects. There are many good products available but all will require a good process, useful content on your site and a disciplined approach for a strong ROI.</p>
<h3 style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Third, Solve the Time Equation</strong></h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Time is the worst enemy of every sales plan.  As each month passes your ability to catch up is diminished, making it difficult or impossible to get your plan back on track. Highly effective executives plan their time at <strong><em>least </em></strong>one quarter out. If you are a CEO, plan on spending one-man week a month in front of existing and prospective accounts.  Impossible you say, but what could be more important than achieving your revenue plan? If you have hired good people trust them to make good decisions and get out and work with the field sales team.  If you are a Chief Sales Officer you should routinely spend 75% of your time working side by side with your field team, working sales opportunities and coaching your team.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Besides, it’s way more fun working deals than dealing with office politics!</em></p>
<p>In baseball terms it’s the top of the third inning. The score may be 5-0 but there is a lot of game left to play. If you have the right team on the field you just need to adjust your game plan. Tell you board where you are, get the right assets out of the bull-pen and get back to game on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/sales-leaders-blog/shared-sales-responsibility-is-no-sales-responsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sales Pipelines &#8211; Win, Lose or No Decisions</title>
		<link>http://3forward.com/pipelines-and-forecasts/sales-pipelines-win-lose-or-no-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://3forward.com/pipelines-and-forecasts/sales-pipelines-win-lose-or-no-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pipelines and Forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Leaders Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3forward.com/?p=5815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After analyzing numerous sales pipelines for clients so far in 2012 we are seeing a trend has continued to gain strength over the last 8 quarters, and that trend is that the competition is stronger than ever!  What a surprise &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Sales-Decisions.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5816" title="Sales Decisions" src="http://3forward.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Sales-Decisions.jpg" alt="" width="274" height="185" /></a>After analyzing numerous sales pipelines for clients so far in 2012 we are seeing a trend has continued to gain strength over the last 8 quarters, and that trend is that the competition is stronger than ever!  What a surprise you say to yourself, you’ve known that for along time. The real question is; do you know who your biggest competitor is? Is it competitor X or competitor Y, or perhaps that new company that just moved into your best territory?</p>
<p><strong>The answer may be a shock to you; your biggest competitor may actually be the dreaded “No Decision”.</strong></p>
<p>No decisions are usually deals whose decision timeline keeps slipping well past their forecasted close dates without substantive reasons from the account.  The rep will give reasons for the ongoing slippage such as, “Someone is on vacation,” There is a new senior executive that needs to be briefed,” or the client has changed internal processes that must be completed before the sale can close.  The truth is that poor prospect qualification and selling too low in an organization are typically the two main root causes to no decision deals.</p>
<h3><strong>Poor Qualification – Cause 1 in Most No Decisions</strong></h3>
<p>Poor prospect qualification often results from sales reps self-selecting sales targets.</p>
<p>Each rep has a unique concept of what the perfect prospect looks like.  If your company does not have a lead generation program running in sales or marketing, then every rep is forced to fill their pipeline with any and all possible fits.  <em>(Sales reps know better than to have too few deals next to their name).</em></p>
<p>As reps try to force fit too many wrong prospects into your products or service two things happen:</p>
<ol>
<li>They waste valuable internal resources pricing and proposing deals.</li>
<li>They cause your overall sales pipeline to become bloated with non-qualified deals.</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong>Calling Too Low – Cause 2 in No Decisions</strong></h3>
<p>The second major reason for a no decision is calling too low within a target account. You may have the best product or solution but if you rely on another person to articulate the value and benefits your chances of success are greatly reduced. “Call high or die” is true, but despite their best efforts sales reps are often relegated to influencers and researchers. The fastest way to lose a deal can be for a sales person <em>to go over the head</em> of one of these people, but savvy sales leaders know that there are ways to do it in a less threatening ways.  This requires a little research to determine a good strategy.  Getting a current client to sponsor an executive referral or engaging with a decision maker at trade or industry event are a couple of examples but there are many more.  Get creative with your rep, it just requires some thought.</p>
<h3><strong>Purging those “No Decisions” from Your Sales Pipeline</strong></h3>
<p>Take the time to really inspect your current pipeline. If you have deals that are older than 150% of your average sales cycle it may mean they have gone “no decision” and you pipeline is overstated.  Another way to view it is if more that 15% of your current qualified pipeline has aged more that 150% of your average sales cycle it’s time to flush the pipeline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://3forward.com/pipelines-and-forecasts/sales-pipelines-win-lose-or-no-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

